Se Rendre Compte Agreement

4. If you have a sentence with a reflexive pronoun plus an object pronoun, the reflexive pronoun is always the indirect object, so there is no correspondence with it. However, there is a correspondence with the pronoun of the object according to the rules of the direct object pronoun agreement. In some expressions, such as just infinitive, let `infinite, realize, and others, the space of the direct object is maintained by an infinitive or other complement that will always follow the main verb. As a general rule, no agreement is reached in these expressions. Do you realize that you have no money left? Do you realize you`re running out of money? Although it is reflexive, the participant of the verb to realize (to be realized) does not correspond to the object of the sentence. This is because the word composes as a direct object (make what? → account). I simply do not put these verbs in the class of pronoun verbs: account for qqch e qqun, please qqun, please qqun, please qqun exist. or verbs where construction allows/requires a direct complement. For example, in reporting, it is account that is in fact the complement with which the past participates should agree! appropriateness is another example.

I realize we`re almost there. I know we`re almost there. Pronoun verbs have a reflexive pronoun that refers to the subject, and this reflexive pronoun represents either the direct object or the indirect object of the verb. Here is the tricky part: the agreement is only necessary if the reflexive pronoun is a direct object; if it is indirect, there is no agreement. So to know if current participants need to agree, you need to determine the function of the reflexive prognosis. That`s how it works. She cut off her hand. She cut off his hand. [The hand is the direct object (here becomes an indirect pronodem of an object that indicates to whom the hand was cut). As the hand does not precede the participatory, there is no agreement.] However, there is still the possibility of a direct opposition agreement in accordance with point 31.2 above. For a long time, banning students from the past French participatory agreement was not as difficult as it was first.

Comments are closed.